Wind damage claims are decided by one opening.

Start here

A windstorm makes two claims, and only one of them is about the roof

Owners describe one event. Carriers run two separate tests on it, under different parts of the same policy, and a claim can pass one and fail the other.

The first test is about the building envelope — the shingles, the ridge, the siding, the fascia and soffit, the vents and flashing. There the argument is cause: did wind do this, or is this a roof reaching the end of its life? That is the same kind of disagreement a hail claim produces, and it is settled the same way, with evidence gathered slope by slope.

The second test is about everything inside — the ceiling, the drywall, the insulation, the flooring, the contents underneath. There the argument is not cause at all. Everyone agrees the water came from the sky. The question is whether wind created an opening for it, because a standard homeowner policy pays for rain reaching the interior only through an opening that wind or hail made. Interior damage is routinely denied on that clause while the roof damage on the very same claim is accepted, and owners are left reading a letter that appears to contradict itself.

So the two halves need different evidence, gathered at different moments — and the interior half has a deadline measured in hours, because the first responsible thing anyone does after a windstorm is cover the hole that proves it.

The wind-created opening: the sentence your interior damage depends on

The wording varies between carriers, but the structure is consistent. Rain, snow and dust driven into the interior are excluded, unless wind or hail first makes an opening in the roof or an outside wall and the water enters through that opening.

Read it twice, because two ordinary situations fall on opposite sides of it. Wind tears off a section of shingles, rain goes through the exposed deck, and the ceiling below is ruined: that is the covered path. Wind-driven rain is forced under an old flashing or a worn vent boot that was already failing, and the same ceiling is ruined: that is the excluded path, because nothing new was opened. The damage inside the house looks identical in both. The claim does not.

That single distinction is why a handful of missing shingles matter far more than their replacement cost. They are the proof that connects the water to the storm, and they are the first thing that disappears — covered by a tarp within hours, or blown into a neighbour's yard and cleaned up the next morning by somebody trying to be helpful.

What a strong interior file contains, and what takes ten minutes to gather:

• The opening itself, before it is covered. Photographed from the ground, wide enough to show which elevation of the house it is on. A close-up of bare decking proves nothing if nobody can tell which roof it belongs to.
• The debris where it landed. Shingles in the yard, a ridge cap on the driveway, siding against the fence. It dates the event, identifies the material, and shows the direction the wind came from.
• The interior while it is still wet. A stain photographed three weeks later reads as an old leak to anyone assessing it. Wet drywall, standing water and an actively dripping ceiling read as what they are.
• The line between the two. A photograph that shows the damaged ceiling directly below the opening is the single most persuasive image in this kind of file, because it makes the path of the water obvious rather than argued.
• The originals, with their metadata. Send files rather than screenshots or messaging-app copies where you can. The embedded date and time are doing real work here.

Creased shingles and broken seals: damage that looks like nothing from the ground

Wind damage is not only the shingles that left. It is also the ones that lifted, folded back, and dropped into place again looking untouched.

An asphalt shingle is held down by a strip of thermal sealant that bonds it to the course beneath. When wind gets under the edge and folds the tab upward, two things happen at once, and neither is visible from the driveway. A crease runs across the mat where it bent, which is a fracture line the shingle will eventually fail along. And the sealant bond is broken, so that tab is no longer attached to anything — the next ordinary storm takes it off at a wind speed that should never have moved it.

This is the damage most commonly written off as wear or as a manufacturing defect, and it is also the damage that decides whether a slope gets repaired or replaced. It is proved by hand: lifting along the courses to find which tabs have lost their seal, photographing the crease with the shingle held open, and recording where on the roof it runs. Wind damage has a signature — it concentrates in a band along the windward edge, the rakes, the ridge and the eave, rather than scattering evenly across every slope. A pattern like that is difficult to attribute to age.

The same storm usually leaves corroborating marks elsewhere, and they belong in the same file: ridge caps loosened or gone, drip edge and flashing lifted, gutters pulled off their brackets, soffit panels pushed out of the channel, fascia detached, siding released at the nail hem, vents bent or displaced. An inspection that counts three missing shingles and scopes three shingles has looked at the obvious and tested nothing.

Your duty to protect the property, and the receipts that come with it

Every property policy contains a condition requiring you to take reasonable steps to prevent further damage after a loss. It is not optional and it is not a courtesy to the insurer — damage that gets worse because nothing was done can be argued about later.

In practice that means tarping the opening, boarding a broken window, shutting off water where it is running, and getting the wet material dried out. Reasonable emergency work of that kind is normally reimbursable under the claim, which makes the paperwork simple and worth doing properly: keep every receipt and invoice, photograph the tarp or the boarding once it is up, and write down the date each thing was done.

Two things to avoid in the same breath. Do not make permanent repairs before the property has been inspected — a slope that has already been replaced is a slope nobody can assess, and it turns a documentation question into an argument about your word. And do not dispose of wet carpet, ruined drywall or damaged contents without photographing and listing them first, for the same reason they matter in any other loss: discarded property is difficult to get paid for.

If a mitigation company dried the house, ask them for the moisture readings and the drying log rather than only the invoice. That record establishes how far the water actually travelled through the structure, which is usually further than the visible stain suggests, and it is the document that supports the interior scope weeks later when everything looks dry.

Trees, debris and the sublimit nobody reads until the crane arrives

A fallen tree turns into several different coverage questions at once, and they do not all have the same answer.

Damage the tree caused to the house is handled as the property damage it is. Removing the tree is a separate matter, normally covered when it has struck a covered structure and normally capped by a sublimit written into the policy — a specific figure, in your documents, that has nothing to do with what the removal costs. Emergency removal with a crane and a traffic closure can run well past that number, and the difference lands on the owner.

A tree that falls and hits nothing is usually not a removal the policy pays for at all, however large it is and however much it costs to take away. That surprises people, and it is worth knowing before the truck is booked.

Detached structures are a different coverage again. A garage, a shed, a pergola or a fence sits under the other-structures limit rather than the dwelling limit, typically set as a percentage of it, and a windstorm that flattens a fence line across a large lot can reach that limit on its own. Where it is safe to wait, reading those two numbers before authorising the work is the difference between a reimbursed cost and an unexpected one.

What to do after a windstorm

1. 1

   Photograph before you cover anything

   The opening, the interior below it, and both in one frame if you can manage it. This is the only evidence that cannot be recreated later, and the tarp that protects your house also hides it.

   Wide shots first, so the elevation is identifiable
2. 2

   Leave the debris where it landed until it is photographed

   Shingles, ridge caps and siding in the yard tell you the material, the slope and the wind direction. Clearing the lawn before anyone records it removes the easiest evidence in the whole claim.

3. 3

   Make the emergency repairs and keep every receipt

   Tarp, board, dry. Your policy requires reasonable steps to prevent further damage, and that work is normally reimbursable. Photograph it once it is done and note the date.

   Temporary only — no permanent repairs before inspection
4. 4

   Anchor the loss to a date

   Note the day and roughly the hour. National Weather Service storm reports and local station gust readings are published by date and county, and they convert your recollection into a record the carrier already trusts.

5. 5

   Ask for the complete policy in writing

   All endorsements, not the declarations page alone. Your wind and hail deductible, the debris-removal sublimit and the other-structures limit are all in there, and each of them changes what a fair settlement looks like before a single shingle is discussed.

   Request it by email so the date is recorded

How I work a wind claim

I inspect the roof myself, slope by slope, as a licensed roofing contractor and a HAAG certified inspector — which means one visit produces both the damage assessment and the real cost of the repair, instead of two people producing two documents that disagree. I lift along the courses to find the tabs that have lost their seal, photograph the creases with the shingle held open, and record where the band of damage runs relative to the wind direction. The collateral marks on the ridge, the drip edge, the gutters, the soffit and the siding go into the same file, because a storm that damaged one part of the envelope rarely damaged only that part.

If water reached the interior, the opening gets documented first and explicitly — where it is, what it exposed, and what sits directly beneath it — because that is the clause the interior scope stands or falls on. Where the house was dried before I arrived, I ask the mitigation company for their moisture log rather than working from what is still visible.

Then I read the policy in full, endorsements included, before discussing any numbers. The wind and hail deductible, the ordinance and law coverage that pays for bringing exposed work up to current code, the sublimits on debris removal and detached structures, and whether the undamaged slopes have a matching argument if the shingle line has been discontinued — all of that is strategy, and finding it in week six is a bad way to find it. The estimate is priced at contractor-level cost with the tear-off, the damaged decking, the underlayment and the accessories that cannot be reused written in rather than left for a supplement nobody files.

I file the claim, meet the insurer's adjuster on the roof, and work through the disagreement line by line. If the interior was denied on the opening clause and the opening was real but never photographed, that is worth reopening with a properly documented inspection — a denial is a conclusion drawn from a record, and a record can be rebuilt.

The consultation and the inspection cost nothing. If I get on your roof and find the carrier scoped it correctly, I will tell you that — it is a shorter conversation and an honest one. If the same storm brought hail, the roof gets tested for hail damage on the same visit. You can see the full range of claim services or book the free inspection whenever you are ready.

Volodymyr Lukaniuk is a public adjuster licensed in Illinois (No. 19461872) and Indiana (No. 3556317), and a HAAG certified inspector (No. 992104047). A public adjuster represents policyholders on insurance claims and is not an attorney. Policy wording varies between insurers — the descriptions here are general and your own policy governs your claim. Nothing here promises a claim outcome, and no adjuster-client relationship exists until a written contract is signed.